Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - assassin

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 »
406
General Discussion / Re: A world without men?
« on: July 12, 2009, 12:25:04 AM »
Quote from: JCE3000GT
If it was part of humanity's plan to not have men then why were we put here to begin with?

To engineer a female-female pregancy!  That, and to earn money so womenfolk can buy shiny trinkets.

407
Game Modification Station / Re: FF6 Patch Allocations?
« on: July 10, 2009, 09:19:13 PM »
the "1"s are too short!  they should be lengthened, or changed to "5/6"s.  otherwise, not bad.

408
Game Modification Station / Re: FF6 Patch Allocations?
« on: July 02, 2009, 08:46:22 PM »
regarding Homesick Gau...  Djibriel gave me permission to host his patches (and modify them if need be), which i've done for 3 so far.  last September, i started work on Homesick Gau, which has two known issues:

1) Djibriel accidentally made this patch on a ROM that had another of his patches applied: an old, buggy version of Sticky Shadow, which crashes the game.
2) after moving enemies around within formations, it is also necessary to update any formation position -specific commands the monsters may have in their scripts.  it looks like Djibriel did this for a few monsters already, but he missed Vermin, Enemy #113.  and i'm not done checking monsters yet.

what i was doing in September '08 (and resumed yesterday) was tedious doublechecking of formations (would be far worse without FF3usME), making sure the edited ones had the correct monster quantities and coordinates, and the mould boxes were big enough.  so far so good, but i abandoned the task because it was boring as hell.

i can upload a patch with #1 fixed, but you'll have to edit Vermin, and whatever other monsters we may find.

409
Game Modification Station / Re: FFVI Font Cleanup
« on: July 02, 2009, 08:27:59 PM »
not bad, but the "0"s on both screens look a little "8"-ish for my tastes.  maybe i'd adjust if i played it for multiple minutes, but that's my initial impression.

410
Game Modification Station / Re: FF6 Patch Allocations?
« on: July 02, 2009, 01:40:46 PM »
huh?  i thought the MP digits patch would just change *existing* digit colors for entities who had damage or healing numbers appear in response to their MP being altered by a spell/attack.  for example, Rasp targets, and Osmose targets and casters.

411
General Discussion / Re: Uh oh.
« on: June 28, 2009, 10:06:11 PM »
me:

Quote
Total time logged in: 2 days, 17 hours and 12 minutes.

412
Gaming Discussion / Re: Doom64EX released
« on: June 25, 2009, 01:28:04 PM »
their neglect of SNES Doom is a grave insult.

413
General Discussion / Re: I Hate Brett Favre
« on: June 25, 2009, 11:29:54 AM »
did he retire after the Jets season, or keep things open-ended?  i don't pay much attention.

414
Game Modification Station / Re: FF6 Patch Allocations?
« on: June 25, 2009, 04:03:21 AM »
darkmage: which version of the ROM are you applying the patches to?  the SwdTech Speedup patch is designed for a v1.0 ROM.  the Readme says that "it should" work on a v1.1 ROM too, but if my ancient post was right:

http://mnrogar.slickproductions.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=241&start=26

it'd actually have to be modified.

415
or without downloading anything, open a command prompt, "cd" into the directory where the ROMs are.  then do "fc/b file1 file2 |more".  ("more" slows the output to one screen at a time.)

416
Game Modification Station / Re: FF6 Patch Allocations?
« on: June 24, 2009, 12:03:38 PM »
i'm not sure on the ArmorVil patch (though i think it affects Bank C1, and maybe something late in C2?), but this reminds me that Imzo still needs to add mblock129's "Shadow is Not a Girl" fix to the document. :P

417
as for free webhosting, i've been pleased with Brinkster:

http://www.brinkster.com/FreePkgLanding.aspx

418
Quote
That might be complicated. Is mblock129 even around anymore?

he's posted on the FF3us Gamefaqs board within the past month or two.  just a couple posts.  an "Attn: mblock129" topic would probably get deleted fairly quickly.  he's logged into mnrogar.com as recently as Jun 17, 2009, so try PMing him there.

also, the 24-bit HP patch wasn't me.  as mentioned, CKlein0001 made one.  the Pandora's Boxers might be making an improved one.

419
General Discussion / Re: Super Duper Stock Market Thread (Part Tres)
« on: June 21, 2009, 10:07:05 AM »
after a big drop in March and then a big rally since, the market's slightly higher than it was for the last post.  the rally has been running out of steam, though.

i recommend buying some PFH (JC Penney Asset Trst 7.625% CABCO Trust).  it's actually "subordinated notes", which is some type of junior debt.  it's lower in the capital structure than senior debt, but higher than preferred stock and common stock, making it safer than them.  these notes pay out a juicy 95.3 cents twice a year, well into the future.  that's currently an 11.20% yield.  bottom line is, i don't think the shares will go to zero or the payments will stop, unless JC Penney goes out of business.  i don't see that happening, though i'm no retail expert.  now, the payout is fixed, so if you think we'll have some ginormous spike in interest rates where 11+ percent is no longer impressive, then PFH might not be for you.

i first read about this on the JCP Yahoo Messageboard (the boards on Yahoo are largely crap, but you'll find the occasional diamond in the rough).  i'd previously owned the JCP common stock and sold it for a profit a couple times, but it skyrocketed and got too pricey for my tastes.  the notes were trading around $11 to $11.50 then, which put the yield at over 16% (it even got into the 20s in early March and in October!) .  unfortunately, Scottrade doesn't let PFH be traded online (probably because the volume is so thin); you have to call in.  i dawdled on the calling, so i didn't buy it until $16.13.  still not bad, but i missed a better opportunity.

it's currently at $17.02.  it bounces around a bit, so if you're interested in buying it, i'd try to pick some up under $16.50, then buy more on the way down if it falls (unless you think JC Penney's going to croak).

you can read up on these notes and preferred shares by punching in the symbol at http://www.quantumonline.com/

anybody wanna be grisly and predict where unemployment tops out?  it's at 9.4% now.  i think it'll just crack 11%.

420
Gaming Discussion / Re: Square-Enix is going after ROM hackers now?
« on: June 04, 2009, 04:37:22 AM »
Quote from: I.S.T.
Read what I've been saying...

It's not Square-Enix at all. It was a badly faked and poorly explained publicity attempt. Still, it managed to fool most people.

Thje fact that the beta(Anyone who calls the leaked version an alpha has no idea what an alpha really is) leaked just before the publicly announced release date is the icing on the cake, IMO.

the whole thing seems convincing to me.  you say the beta leak is "icing on the cake"; what are your other supporting reasons for this being a stunt?

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 »