Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Lenophis

886
Gaming Discussion / Re: The Mechanics of Runiced/Runicked Spells
« on: January 13, 2010, 02:28:40 PM »
It's actually fairly easy. Any spell that is single target (ie Hyperdrive, Fire3, etc) can be Runic'ed. Any spell that is party-wide (ie Ultima, Meteor) cannot be Runic'ed. I don't remember if there are exceptions to this or not, been too long. :sleep:

887
General Discussion / Re: Gamefaqs + eternal stupidity
« on: January 12, 2010, 06:35:14 PM »
I agree with that statement, yet I managed to make myself play through the game a few times to get all 12 endings. :eek: I stopped building up Gau in my FF6 file a long time ago, and haven't touched the game since.

888
General Discussion / Re: Gamefaqs + eternal stupidity
« on: January 12, 2010, 02:49:53 PM »
Bullshit.
Elaborate?

^ clarification needed.
At first I thought he was thinking of some PSP port, but I don't know. :whoa:

889
General Discussion / Re: Gamefaqs + eternal stupidity
« on: January 11, 2010, 06:17:53 PM »
We have a normal discussion! Even Meeple's rambling isn't as bad! :happy:

890
Game Modification Station / Re: (Generic) Bloopers!
« on: January 11, 2010, 04:19:22 AM »
Whoa, a HOM polygon hallway. :laugh:

891
General Discussion / Re: Gamefaqs + eternal stupidity
« on: January 10, 2010, 07:30:49 PM »
He who does not get it wishes to bend the rules in his favor. Really? That's never been done before. :tongue:

The game runs on potential only! He must be Scott Boras, there's no other explanation other than he thinks potential means more than reality...

892
General Discussion / Re: NFL season (2009-2010), week 18 - playoffs?!
« on: January 10, 2010, 07:23:52 PM »
That was a pretty amazing game. And now we have some insanity. :happy:

(3) Cowboys @ (2) Vikings (Sunday, 1:00 pm EST)
(4) Cardinals @ (1) Saints (Saturday, 4:30 pm EST)
(5) Jets @ (2) Chargers (Sunday, 4:40 pm EST)
(6) Ravens @ (1) Colts (Saturday, 8:15 pm EST)

893
General Discussion / Re: NFL season (2009-2010), week 18 - playoffs?!
« on: January 10, 2010, 04:25:37 PM »
Yikes, Packers/Cardinals has not been a game. The Packers first three plays lead to 2 turnovers, and the Cardinals got 14 points off those turnovers. :omg:

Barely in the second quarter, it's 17-0.

894
Obviously, the pie chart is playing favorites. Only the news gets the pie! :childish: Actually, your post count is accurate. The private boards do not add to the total. We did that intentionally, otherwise I'd have close to 1000 already, and Dragonsbrethren would have close to 2500. Then there's Deathlike who'd overtake everyone with 7000. :wtf:

Sarcasm aside... :cycle:

895
General Discussion / Re: NFL season (2009-2010), week 18 - playoffs?!
« on: January 09, 2010, 10:22:44 PM »
Well, the 13-year streak is over. :omg: Cowboys are in the homer dome next week taking on Favre.

896
General Discussion / Re: NFL season (2009-2010), week 18 - playoffs?!
« on: January 09, 2010, 07:50:30 PM »
shit.. i was in the shower longer than i thought.
I'd hate to see your water bill. :laugh:

Quote
1) Cincinnati (i realize i'm late with this officially.  but my January 04, 2010, 04:50:20 am post strongly hinted at 3 of my picks.  and the Bengals are trailing as i type this.  so can you guys please count this as valid?  :blush:)
If the Bengals had been up 35-7 or something like that, probably not. But since the game was still up in the air, sure. Not that it matters, we lost anyway. :sad:

897
General Discussion / Re: NFL season (2009-2010), week 18 - playoffs?!
« on: January 08, 2010, 03:59:19 AM »
Since it won't be any clearer Friday vs Saturday to pick, I'll just go ahead and do it now. Keep in mind, I'll have zero confidence in all of these.

Packers @ Cardinals: Cardinals
Eagles @ Cowboys: Cowboys
Ravens @ Patriots: Ravens
Jets @ Bengals: Bengals

Really, all of these are toss-ups. :scared:

:edit:

Some reasoning is in order, yes?

Packers/Cardinals: Honestly, I have no idea.
Eagles/Cowboys: History favors teams trying to beat an opponent three times in a season, a 12-7 record I believe. Division games are strange like that.
Ravens/Patriots: I think Brady being dinged up and Welker being out may be more of a factor than people will believe.
Jets/Bengals: The Bengals are too good to let what happened last week repeat itself.

898
Gaming Discussion / Re: How to do Step Mine for 0 MP
« on: January 07, 2010, 02:06:12 PM »
Just one byte, a 65,535 counter would be a wee bit overkill. Well, maybe. :tongue:

899
Gaming Discussion / Re: How to do Step Mine for 0 MP
« on: January 07, 2010, 03:20:30 AM »
There is a 0x40 byte range of free stuff starting at $1440, and I promptly took $1440 for my purpose.

900
Gaming Discussion / Re: How to do Step Mine for 0 MP
« on: January 07, 2010, 02:30:07 AM »
please do.  if it's incrementing more often than 60x a second, it's not really a "frame counter".  now, it may still suffice for fixing the Randomosity bug, but it'll work differently than what i had in mind (i.e. the solution i proposed for the existing game).
Good news: I'm consistent with the game's behavior, transitions stop $021E.
Bad news: I still can't tell if I have a frame counter or not. bsnes's hex editor updates "once every emulated second," which is far too slow for this test. Geiger's updates more frequently, but still not nearly fast enough. If FCEUXD could work for this, I'd have it made. That hex editor knows how to get it done. :happy: